Best WhatsApp CRM for real estate (2026)
We compared the 6 most-used WhatsApp CRMs for Indian and GCC real estate. Here's who wins for developers, brokers and CP networks — and why.
LandinChat vs Wati vs AiSensy vs Interakt vs Sell.do vs LeadSquared
| Feature | LandinChat | Wati | AiSensy | Interakt | Sell.do | LeadSquared |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Real-estate-specific templates | Partial | |||||
| Auto RERA disclosure injection | ||||||
| Native Sell.do / LeadSquared sync | Webhook only | Webhook only | Webhook only | N/A | N/A | |
| CP distribution + payout | Partial | Partial | ||||
| Site-visit Flow scheduler | ||||||
| Green tick assistance | Extra fee | Extra fee | Extra fee | |||
| Pricing model | Flat + Meta cost | Per-message markup | Per-message markup | Per-message markup | Annual CRM license | Annual CRM license |
| Meta Tech Partner |
Who should pick what
Developer (≥1 project, ≥3 RMs): LandinChat. RERA injection, project-level segmentation, Sell.do / LeadSquared sync and CP attribution save 60+ hours/month of ops work and lift visit-to-booking by 30–40%.
Brokerage (3–50 agents): LandinChat. Shared inbox + portal qualifier removes per-seat per-message friction. Wati works but burns budget at scale.
Solo broker: LandinChat solo plan. Cheapest path to green tick + portal lead capture.
CP network / aggregator: LandinChat. No competitor ships rules-based distribution + real-time attribution + commission payout for WhatsApp.
D2C / non-real-estate use case: Wati or AiSensy are fine; LandinChat still wins on price at scale.